Thursday, January 27, 2011

2011 Star Stryker Review

Contributing to Star’s success is its big-bore custom-style Raider, winner of our Mainstream Chopper Shootout. The turnkey custom theme seems a safe bet these days.
Industry data provided by Star shows that 73% of the mid-size cruiser segment consists of custom-style cruisers. We only have to look to Honda’s surprisingly popular Fury as some hard evidence to support this data.
The new Star Stryker brings custom cruiser appeal to a price point.
In light of the custom domination, and building on the groundwork laid by the Raider, Star saw a perfect opportunity to fill a gap in its mid-size cruiser lineup by creating the Stryker.
This newest Star is powered by an 80-cubic-inch liquid-cooled, four-valve-head, SOHC, fuel-injected 60-degree V-Twin. With a few exceptions, like a larger airbox, new ECU and reconfigured EFI, the Stryker’s lump is largely the same as the Twin that motivates the V Star 1300.
This mid-size Star engine gets its 1304cc displacement through an unusually oversquare bore and stroke (100mm x 83mm) for a cruiser. Conversely, Honda's VTX 1300 (powering the Fury) uses an 89.5mm bore and 104.3mm stroke to achieve its 1312cc size. Also, the Star uses a belt drive to transfer power to the rear. A belt final-drive isn’t as virtually maintenance-free as the shaft final-drive the Fury utilizes, but belt drive is lighter and allows for easier customization.
A 1304cc, liquid-cooled, 60-degree Twin powers the new Stryker, and remains mostly the same mill that powers the V Star 1300.An all-new cradle-type steel frame was crafted to carry the 1300.
Although the single-pin crankshaft engine is rigid-mounted in the new frame, dual counter balancers in the engine offset vibes, yet not so much to entirely mute the power pulse feel inherent in a single-pin crank. That lumpity-lump sensation (and resulting burly exhaust note) is very influential on riders partial to V-Twins.
Since styling is the linchpin for custom cruiser appeal, Star designers knew that a raked-looking front-end was elemental to the Stryker’s look.
In order to achieve the desired chopper look without sacrificing good handling qualities, a 6.0-degree offset triple clamp is matched to a 34.0-degree steering head angle for an effective steering rake of 40 degrees. This set up results in 109mm of trail – a figure that offers decent compromise between stability and quick-ish cruiser handling.
The Stryker’s cast aluminum rear wheel is on loan from the Raider and carries a 210/40-18 tire; a 310mm rotor and single-piston brake caliper also reside out back.
Despite a custom cruiser-requisite fat rear tire, the Stryker offers linear steering and predictable handling.Like the importance of that raked front-end look, Star also knew a big, airy front wheel is integral to the chopper/custom design, and so a 21-inch wheel spins at the end of the preload-adjustable 41mm fork.
This big front hoop, however, doesn’t ride on the customary skinny tire. To help aid solid handling, Star instead used a 120/70-21 front tire where a pizza cutter 110 – or sometimes even a 90 – section tire is often found on custom-type bikes.
Although the Stryker’s front wheel looks a whole lot like the front wheel on the Raider, it is in fact different since a single 320mm rotor is attached to it, whereas the Raider employs dual 298mm rotors. Bridgestone Exedra tires grace the Stryker’s wheels.
According to Star, the Stryker boasts the lowest seat height in the Star line at 26.4 inches, while its rider triangle is a bit more open than the V Star’s ergos.
An all-new handlebar-mounted instrument gauge departs from the common custom bike theme of placing the gauge(s) on the fuel tank. The Stryker’s gauge consists of an analog speedo, the usual array of warning lights and an inset LCD offering two trip meters, clock, odometer and fuel gauge.
Along with some of the best chicken-fried steak, BBQ beef ribs and fried catfish in the country, the Austin, Texas area is also known for its rolling hills topography, more affectionately referred to as Hill Country. Music is pretty popular here, too (wink).
A circuitous 125-mile route that included some urban and freeway stints, but consisted mostly of meandering two-lane country roads winding their way over softly undulating hills and into shallow valleys in this lusher-than-expected part of Texas served as the testing grounds.
Saddling up to the Stryker I was quickly impressed by an ergo package as comfortable as Star staffers claimed.
Although the Stryker’s styling means a long, low stance, rider ergos don’t suffer as a result. Most folks should find the fit comfortable for many miles before needing a stretch or pee break.Although the Stryker’s styling means a long, low stance, rider ergos don’t suffer as a result. Most folks should find the fit comfortable for many miles before needing a stretch or pee break.
Reach to the handlebar and forward foot controls felt natural for my 5-foot, 8-inch frame and 30-inch inseam; and the deeply contoured saddle did a good job of holding me in place. Also, I was grateful that the ergos did not position me so that my hips rotated forward. I sat squarely on my bum rather than on my tailbone, and seat foam density was supportively firm.
Of course, fit and feel in the first 15 miles of a ride is often a different experience than at the 120th mile.
However, overall ride comfort was consistent throughout the day, and the unfaired fists-in-the-wind position didn’t result in excessive windblast or buffeting. Even a much taller, 6-foot, 2-inch rider agreed with my favorable assessment of the Stryker’s rider triangle.
Lending greatly to the Stryker’s pleasant ride is a well-balanced suspension package that offered better-than-expected damping from both the shock and fork.
Road surfaces were in excellent condition, so a run through rutted urban streets or choppy highway pavement may reveal some harsh hits from the fork or shock. But I’ve no reason to think the Stryker’s overall good ride quality would diminish much when ridden over crummy roads.
Steering effort was, at worst, minimal, especially for a bike with a fat 210 rear tire, and 21-incher up front.
The handlebar-mounted single-unit instrument location makes reading them at a glance easier than if they were mounted on the fuel tank – a common location on other cruisers.The handlebar-mounted single-unit instrument location makes reading them at a glance easier than if they were mounted on the fuel tank – a common location on other cruisers.
The Stryker never exhibited the “chopper flop” common in custom bike handling. It was quite the opposite, actually, with notably linear motion from upright to the gentle angles most cruisers need to complete a turn. The Stryker stayed on course perfectly throughout turns, and ground clearance was greater than expected. Only aggressive, quick turning resulted in touching a footpeg feeler.
Another welcome surprise was the amount of thrust the 1300cc Vee generated.
Dumping the clutch and slamming the throttle open in first gear gets the big rear tire spinning quickly, leaving a smoky black streak without much effort. And although gearing in the 5-speed box feels quite tall (top gear feels like overdrive), the engine ably pulls the tall gearing.
Carrying two gears higher than necessary means lugging the engine, but the Twin pulls cleanly if you’re one gear too high, even if it’s a quick downshift from 5th to 4th at slower speeds.
Additionally, some driveline lash is apparent, but mostly when transitioning from a closed to open throttle. Shifting action was of typical modern Japanese motorcycle quality, and fueling seemed perfect with no hesitation in throttle response.
Hauling down a bike with a claimed wet weight of 646 lbs sounds like the job for some serious binders. The Stryker’s humble brake package was easily up to task, with decent feel from the style-conscious single caliper/rotor combo in front.

0 comments:

Post a Comment